Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 11:46
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 158
2-Core 313
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,183
106% 894 Pts
64-Core 2,200
136% 2,200 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.7% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 60.2
49% 62.6 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 57
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 2TB-$668
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 440 442 444 444 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 436
Mixed 392
SusWrite 442
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 50.2
164% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 184
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 127%
Asmt USB 3.1 Storage 512GB
312GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 367 368 369 291 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 322
Write 364
Mixed 323
SusWrite 313
75% 330 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 35.4
115% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 245
182% 240 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 89%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
30GB free
Firmware: 507KC4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 136 136 138 139 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.5% Above average
Read 136
Write 202
Mixed 154
SusWrite 139
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 33.9
121% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 81.1
88% 147 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
490GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 128 129 130 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 160
Write 122
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 129
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 26.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback