Ciara DQ67SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCiara DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 06:53
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 359
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 64.9
Reflection 64.1
Parallax 86.2
53% 71.7 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 54.3
49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-120 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.10.60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 134 127 127 126 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 366
Write 196
Mixed 203
SusWrite 155
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 21
81% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 48.1
DQ Write 49.8
DQ Mixed 44.1
34% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 192 193 194 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 176
Mixed 111
SusWrite 193
126% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273EB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Ciara DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback