PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130408 |
Uptime | 28.1 Days |
Run Date | May 11 '20 at 04:50 |
Run Duration | 214 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
56.7%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Diamond(1092 7970) 3GB
CLim: 1125 MHz, MLim: 1575 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
|
||||
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
29GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 62 95 94 94 95 MB/s
|
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
4GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 61 70 58 60 65 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
47GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 18 18 MB/s
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
9GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 92 93 91 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
TRUSTED Mass Storage 17.5TB
13TB free, PID 4d10
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.5 7.2 6.7 5.4 5.2 MB/s
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
8GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4 F3-1600C11-4G F3-1600C11-4G F3-10666CL9-4 16GB
667, 800, 800, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
39.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 949x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 860x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 398x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 283x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 181x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 160x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $366 |