Asus F1A75-I DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-I DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110829
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 20:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60
FM1 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 37
2-Core 65.9
41% 59.1 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 101
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 3.43
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 2.88
3% 3.65 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 4.09
3% 3.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 128 129 132 128 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.3% Average
Read 230
Write 141
Mixed 172
SusWrite 128
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 22.3
83% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.3
DQ Write 94.3
DQ Mixed 37.8
36% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 130 132 128 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 164
Write 142
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 129
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 9905403-400.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-I DELUXE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-I DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback