Asrock H97 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97 Performance  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180307
Uptime24.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 19:57
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 421
58% 428 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 104
Parallax 89.3
83% 98.4 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 95
78% 94.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 126 12 62 103 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 410
Write 339
Mixed 317
SusWrite 110
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 17.5
71% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 8.4
DQ Mixed 41.6
35% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 55%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
39GB free
Firmware: 6.0.3b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 106 102 88 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.1% Good
Read 254
Write 153
Mixed 194
SusWrite 103
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 33.7
139% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 149
116% 159 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 80%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
829GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 391 458 457 453 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 463
Mixed 386
SusWrite 416
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 46.8
168% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 359
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 113%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
180GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 81 81 79 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 86
Write 81.7
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 79.8
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Performance Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Performance - $171

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback