Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 09:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 32.4
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 141
41% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 382
42% 334 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Asus(1043 057D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 183
86% 124 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 101
Splatting 124
89% 106 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron 128GB-$90
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 31 35 25 26 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 83%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
45GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 246 252 236 233 219 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 527
Write 617
Mixed 101
SusWrite 254
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 17.6
64% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 308
368% 639 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback