Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 04:23
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 133
2-Core 259
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 525
70% 526 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Asus(1043 057D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 101
Parallax 230
99% 151 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 113
Splatting 133
97% 116 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron 128GB-$90
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 53 53 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 83%
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
14GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,558
Write 1,108
Mixed 287
215% 984 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 92.7
325% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 250
340% 618 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback