Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 05:42
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 223
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 730
71% 583 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 92 84 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 455
Write 275
Mixed 174
SusWrite 101
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 18.4
66% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 7.8
DQ Mixed 41.6
34% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 54%
Fujitsu MJA2500BH FFS G1 500GB
253GB free
Firmware: 00810021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 80
Write 75.2
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 67.4
48% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C15 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 26.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback