Gateway DX4860

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGateway DX4860  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway DX4860
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '20 at 05:17
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 93
2-Core 185
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 463
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.12.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 60.5
41% 48.9 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 47.7
37% 45.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 435
Mixed 311
91% 408 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 32.8
108% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 161
171% 284 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
358GB free
Firmware: JC66
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 116
Mixed 65
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 70%
Generic- SD/MMC 197GB
110GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.5
Write 18.2
Mixed 17.2
23% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.4
124% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 HU564403EP0200 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DX4860 Builds (Compare 556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway DX4860

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback