Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '17 at 05:13
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 479
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 2.94
4% 4.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.29%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY XLR8 120GB-$150
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 524ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 250
Write 104
Mixed 149
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 9.56
64% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 7.16
24% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38%
Great: 39%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 93.4
Mixed 86.4
70% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.23
71% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMT8GX3M2A2000C9 029E CMT4GX3M2A2000C8 029E CMT4GX3M2A2000C8 029E CMT8GX3M2A2000C9 12GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,020
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback