HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.62% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F2
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 10:23
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 234
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 680
68% 553 Pts
64-Core 684
42% 684 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.62% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 9.25
6% 9.57 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 15.9
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.62%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 81.00A81
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85.7
Write 26.3
Mixed 69.5
46% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
GARMIN VIRB SD CARD 32GB
16GB free, PID 2002
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.2
6% 5.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.3
82% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
405GB free, PID ce23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.7
Write 34.7
Mixed 27.7
42% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 859B CT8G4DFD824A.C16FF 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 23.7
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX Builds (Compare 1,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop PC 570-p0XX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback