Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 04:55
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 223
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 452
60% 448 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 63.9
Parallax 76.7
51% 67.9 fps
MRender 64.7
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 52.7
48% 59 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 112 100 99 93 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 403
Write 231
Mixed 305
SusWrite 147
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 39.4
140% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 206
173% 250 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL4G24C16U4B.8FB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 32.4
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 25.8
76% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $547Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback