Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 02:48
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 155
2-Core 310
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,226
109% 922 Pts
64-Core 2,332
144% 2,332 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2777 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 187
Parallax 173
139% 177 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 172
Splatting 121
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
335GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 179 174 208 174 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 1,004
Write 1,544
Mixed 1,238
SusWrite 182
224% 992 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 16.6
82% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 594
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 550
416% 558 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 100%
Great: 459%
Amd-raid WDC WD10EALX-009 1TB
311GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 52 53 53 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 98.7
Write 78.5
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 52.2
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 76%
Amd-raid WDC WD6002FRYZ-0 6TB
413GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 76 80 78 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 124
Write 129
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 77.5
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
183% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 121%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 99 106 104 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 324
Write 216
Mixed 168
SusWrite 103
150% 203 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
335% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 123%
Great: 190%
Amd-raid Hitachi HDS72302 2TB
44GB free
Firmware: MN6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 66 70 67 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
41% Average
Read 75.5
Write 75.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 67
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41%
Great: 80%
Amd-raid Array 5 2TB
41GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 69 69 68 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 82.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 69.6
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.4
128% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$193
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 39.7
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback