Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502DU
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 17:38
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 157
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 613
56% 468 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18D1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.26.03
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 25.4
16% 40.3 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 22.8
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ3 512GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 381 478 23 26 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 547
Write 617
Mixed 604
SusWrite 240
113% 502 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 27.4
87% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 581
470% 672 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 150%
JMicron Generic 240GB
127GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 96 115 96 102 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 318
Write 124
Mixed 125
SusWrite 107
196% 169 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 9.2
1,048% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 11.7
DQ Write 30.1
DQ Mixed 10.8
1,434% 17.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 135%
Great: 231%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 26
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.6
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU Builds (Compare 600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback