Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G9-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2_SKS
Memory41 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 00:26
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 602
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HMJP-00000 512GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 413 413 413 354 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 461
Write 426
Mixed 363
SusWrite 368
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 33
114% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 219
169% 238 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 125%
WD Elements 1TB
415GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 81 81 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 74.7
Write 76.4
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 79.3
95% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
NORELSYS 106X 320GB
163GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 12 0 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 32
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 25.8
39% 29 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 KHX2666C15S4/16G ACR24D4S7S8MB-8 KHX2666C15S4/16G 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 26.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback