Asus H87M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H87M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 16:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 234
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 578
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 590
36% 590 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 64.4
Parallax 63.3
48% 62.1 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 56.6
Splatting 50.8
48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi500 S3 480GB SSD
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 387 426 433 436 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 431
Mixed 350
SusWrite 377
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 25.9
137% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 34.2
70% 140 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6J1 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M-PLUS Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-PLUS - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback