HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory41.6 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 11:56
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 73.3
2-Core 146
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 580
54% 447 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Dell(1028 2B20) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 5.78
6% 6.58 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 7.3
5% 6.58 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 140 163 163 159 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.9% Average
Read 218
Write 155
Mixed 167
SusWrite 153
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 23.6
74% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 123
105% 153 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 82%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
161GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 164 119 101 89 85 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.1% Average
Read 224
Write 207
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 119
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 17.5
60% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 112
105% 163 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 88%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
83GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 100 60 58 44 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.8% Average
Read 223
Write 212
Mixed 73
SusWrite 78.2
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 18.3
60% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 97.8
98% 158 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$33
189GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 109 114 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
62% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 112
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ41EF8BCFA-DJ-F ID:... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback