HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 04:12
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 199
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 389
50% 380 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 848E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.35
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 2.43
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 459 454 459 451 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 311
Mixed 350
SusWrite 453
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 52.3
172% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
465GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 122 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 121
Write 120
Mixed 72
SusWrite 124
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 69%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 40
Write 38
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 4.8
38% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 66%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 38.8
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 38
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback