Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '17 at 21:20
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 85.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 550
57% 457 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC120G3LA726B087-370 120GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 524A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 233
Write 91
Mixed 148
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 14.2
82% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 35.2
48% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 47%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 93
Mixed 91.7
71% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.11
4K Mixed 0.29
76% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMT8GX3M2A2000C9 029E CMT4GX3M2A2000C8 029E CMT4GX3M2A2000C8 029E CMT8GX3M2A2000C9 12GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,020
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback