Lenovo ThinkSystem SR550 -[7X04CTO1WW]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo ThinkSystem SR550 -[7X04CTO1WW]-  (all builds)
MotherboardLenovo -[7X04CTO1WW]-
Memory119.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 13:11
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4215
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 96
2-Core 192
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 686
64% 535 Pts
64-Core 2,034
126% 2,034 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lenovo RAID 930-16i-4GB 275GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.10
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,458
Write 3,883
Mixed 3,624
819% 3,655 MB/s
4K Read 106
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 105
351% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 475
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 446
343% 466 MB/s
Lenovo RAID 930-16i-4GB 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 486 488 488 488 486 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
306% Outstanding
Read 3,454
Write 3950
Mixed 3,700
SusWrite 520
653% 2,906 MB/s
4K Read 110
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 110
368% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 450
345% 468 MB/s
Lenovo RAID 930-16i-4GB 16TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 5.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 838 616 615 614 616 612 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
329% Outstanding
Read 3,515
Write 4,003
Mixed 1,230
SusWrite 652
523% 2,350 MB/s
4K Read 110
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 121
388% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 596
455% 611 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7JJR8N-WM 8x16GB
8 of 12 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback