HP p7-1298c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP p7-1298c  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120831
Uptime45.4 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 05:17
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 45.9
34% 48 Pts
4-Core 84.2
8-Core 108
12% 96.2 Pts
64-Core 113
7% 113 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 240
Zotac(19DA 2134) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 6.15
Parallax 1.94
5% 4.65 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.61
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
609GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MN6OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 43 29 9.1 10 11 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 7.9
Mixed 11.6
SusWrite 21.9
9% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5040MM58F9F1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1298c Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1298c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback