PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-MX USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121009 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 03 '20 at 23:44 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
39.8%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1637 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 138 154 156 167 163 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
|||
Sandisk S064G 63GB
58GB free
Firmware: 3.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 139 153 155 164 165 MB/s
|
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
185GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 80 87 89 95 94 MB/s
|
52.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 70x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 68x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 51x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 40x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |