MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory40.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160719
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateMay 03 '20 at 08:08
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 682
67% 549 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 152
Parallax 147
146% 159 fps
MRender 91.9
Gravity 134
Splatting 91.3
85% 106 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 121%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 169 155 138 135 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 475
Write 446
Mixed 373
SusWrite 175
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 44.3
144% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 220
193% 290 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
134GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 358 283 282 262 253 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 448
Mixed 376
SusWrite 307
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 48.2
154% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 355
256% 334 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 100%
Great: 134%
USB 3.0 1TB
418GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 349 326 303 304 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 10.2
Write 353
Mixed 347
SusWrite 322
413% 258 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 26
2,056% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 47.9
DQ Mixed 34
2,886% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 175%
Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 37.6
116% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback