Sony SVD1321Z9RB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 44% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemSony SVD1321Z9RB  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '20 at 06:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 94
52% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 110
16% 114 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sony(104D 90B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.22
1% 1.29 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 2.96
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTD256HAGL-00000 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT2400Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 174 199 210 220 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 377
Write 196
Mixed 145
SusWrite 199
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 15.5
58% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 56.1
83% 159 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 79%
Asmt USB3.0 1TB
16GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 56 55 57 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 128
Write 107
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 56.2
58% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53%
Great: 95%
Asmt USB3.0 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 54 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Read 30.4
Write 24.5
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 53.8
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback