Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 11:53
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 396
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 43.4
Parallax 38.9
36% 42.3 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 34.7
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 120GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 393 417 414 336 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 396
Mixed 374
SusWrite 304
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 28.5
154% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 44.3
94% 187 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
931GB free
Firmware: 1AG01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 113 113 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 109
Write 77.5
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 108
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 59%
General UDisk 16GB
9GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 9.9 9.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 14.8
Write 10.8
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 10
16% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.6
146% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-001.A01LF 99U5471-001.A01LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.8% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback