Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3710 12,685 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Memory 19.4 1-Core 25.4 2-Core 49.9 18% 31.6 Pts	4-Core 87.4 8-Core 85.9 12% 86.7 Pts	64-Core 96.4 6% 96.4 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IM2S3138E-128GM-B 128GB 3,316 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: E27-HP SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 111 96 85 129 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 321 Write 156 Mixed 159 SusWrite 110 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 36.8 4K Mixed 22.4 78% 26.3 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 96.9 85% 128 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 79%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 30GB free, PID null, Adata 34Gb SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 3.3 5.1 5.9 2.8 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.74% Terrible	Read 24 Write 9 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 4.3 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 26% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.74% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 5.3 18% 6.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 325 12% 325 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,495x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,738x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	378x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	342x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16