Asrock N68-VGS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VGS3 FX  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 14:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 79.4
45% 67 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 155
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Zotac(19DA 1160) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.99% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.04 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.99%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 85 88 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 88.7
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE 1TB
108GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.4 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 102
Write 4.7
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 5.4
22% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT351E6CFR8C-H9 Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 6GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VGS3 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback