Asrock Z87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 08:44
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 195
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 561
60% 475 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 81.1
52% 71 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 55.5
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 345 345 322 201 207 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 429
Write 300
Mixed 246
SusWrite 293
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 38.6
132% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 131
145% 248 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 110%
Intenso SATAIII 512GB
68GB free
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 227 64 122 86 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 493
Write 427
Mixed 407
SusWrite 154
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 28.2
132% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 42.8
94% 188 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 97%
Intenso SATA III SSD 480GB
113GB free
Firmware: 61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 386 104 100 100 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.4% Average
Read 263
Write 114
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 193
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 14.4
60% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 18.8
DQ Write 26.5
DQ Mixed 26.4
19% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 102%
TDK LoR TF10 32GB
28GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.3 5.7 7.2 4.2 3.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.6
8% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
97GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 22 26 25 23 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 61.5
Write 64
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 25.9
58% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.3
107% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 19.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87M Pro4 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $319
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback