Asrock Z87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 08:33
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 103
2-Core 182
75% 125 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 575
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 88.7
52% 73.5 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 55.3
50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 182 209 212 226 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 313
Mixed 279
SusWrite 214
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 40.2
153% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 134
148% 252 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 110%
Intenso SATAIII 512GB
68GB free
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 140 77 81 25 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
46% Average
Read 494
Write 429
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 130
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 1.1
48% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 17.5
DQ Mixed 1.2
31% 81.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46%
Great: 97%
Intenso SATA III SSD 480GB
113GB free
Firmware: 61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 364 105 104 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 278
Mixed 319
SusWrite 191
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 94.5
4K Mixed 43
162% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 210
176% 253 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 102%
TDK LoR TF10 32GB
28GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.2 4.2 4.9 4.8 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Read 15
Write 2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.5
7% 6.43 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
97GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 23 24 27 22 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 62.5
Write 64
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 25.9
59% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
110% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87M Pro4 - $102

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $319
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback