Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 11:27
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 179
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 348
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.93
Reflection 2.96
Parallax 2.47
2% 2.79 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.97
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 64 76 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 359
Write 306
Mixed 268
SusWrite 69.7
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 12.8
61% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 14.6
24% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
466GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 74 65 76 68 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 113
Write 107
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 72.5
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030KD68F9F1600 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback