Biostar A880G+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A880G+  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100830
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '17 at 14:38
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 20-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 82.2
47% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 161
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Biostar(1565 1705) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.57
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.57
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 78.6
Write 79.2
Mixed 14.7
42% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.15
4K Mixed 0.07
29% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST3250623NS 250GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 48.3
Write 16.7
Mixed 15.3
20% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.03
5% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A880G+ Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A880G+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback