ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory	11 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170509
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '20 at 01:35
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	PSE-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 207 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 395 53% 397 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Lighting 71.8 Reflection 70.8 Parallax 88.6 58% 77 fps	MRender 72.4 Gravity 72.4 Splatting 58.4 54% 67.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 271 295 286 258 277 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 442 Write 423 Mixed 375 SusWrite 294 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 39 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 52.1 174% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 362 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 82GB free Firmware: 1H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 101 93 93 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 76.7 Write 76.8 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 97.5 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 69%
WD WD3200BEVS-16VAT0 320GB 1,492 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 48GB free Firmware: 1A12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 41 41 42 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 44.7 Write 42.3 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 41 30% 40.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 37%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 250GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 47GB free Firmware: 0342 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 40.7 Write 38 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 37.9 26% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 31%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 13GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 137 144 153 136 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 160 Write 152 Mixed 68.3 SusWrite 143 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 1302 PSD34G160081 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 1302 PSD34G160081 14GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	54.8% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.7 55% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback