Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE R840 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130108
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '20 at 21:15
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% Socket rPGA988B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 76.5 1-Core 62.9 2-Core 110 52% 83.2 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 158 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 177 11% 177 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7400M 4,688 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0004) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.16 fps	MRender 1.86 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 2.17 2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KI256G8 256GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHF002D SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 216 224 228 230 229 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.5% Above average	Read 240 Write 224 Mixed 218 SusWrite 221 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 25.5 82% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 182 140% 190 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.6% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 8.8 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16