Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2732 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 14:59
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$38
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 85
2-Core 145
67% 108 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 231
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 250
15% 250 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 4.72
3% 4.69 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8
5% 5.81 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 255
Write 342
Mixed 349
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 39.7
145% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 182
145% 209 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$46
561GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 134 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 134
Write 142
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 132
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
MXT-USB Storage Device 4GB
4GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Read 16
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 4.2
8% 7.38 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.6
166% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6AFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback