Asus H81M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 14 '19 at 04:59
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 271
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 4.78
3% 4.71 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.13
5% 5.85 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 79 61 92 81 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.2% Average
Read 156
Write 247
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 104
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 40.5
70% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 172
145% 217 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$46
342GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 99 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 126
Write 131
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 98.3
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6AFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-A Builds (Compare 1,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $313
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback