Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190822
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 00:52
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 210
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 597
59% 484 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20.36.03
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.7% Average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 52.3
50% 57.5 fps
MRender 44.3
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 50
40% 48.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 54 57 54 57 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 1,295
Write 854
Mixed 786
SusWrite 109
168% 761 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.3
204% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 91.6
110% 197 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 133%
Great: 209%
SABRENT 240GB
83GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 224 222 239 222 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 303
Write 244
Mixed 242
SusWrite 223
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 27.2
91% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 162
124% 170 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 74%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 248GB
231GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 40 43 33 25 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 98.2
Write 43.3
Mixed 55
SusWrite 34.3
70% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.6
108% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 29%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
15GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 13
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 4.5
16% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2
141% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 13%
USB Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.56% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.75 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback