Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 13:22
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 191
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 444
48% 381 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 29
Parallax 39.4
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 38
Splatting 34
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ OCTANE 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 163 187 204 201 175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 291
Write 201
Mixed 209
SusWrite 182
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 15.3
62% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 74.1
DQ Mixed 64.3
56% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 66%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
46GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 111 29 29 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 285
Write 257
Mixed 238
SusWrite 110
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 11.7
46% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 42.1
43% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
122GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 125 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67% Good
Read 110
Write 56.2
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 124
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
183GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 133 137 136 137 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 107
Write 78.5
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 134
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$50
105GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 124
Write 122
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 76.7
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
205GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 84 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 142
Write 81
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 82.5
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback