Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime2 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 13:14
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 453
54% 417 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 29
Parallax 35.4
32% 34.6 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 34.4
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ OCTANE 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 163 194 238 229 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 293
Write 250
Mixed 221
SusWrite 194
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 17.3
64% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 67.7
59% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 66%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
46GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 181 90 45 60 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 301
Write 250
Mixed 241
SusWrite 119
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 14.4
45% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 42
46% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
122GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 145 148 150 148 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 95.5
Write 100
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 146
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
183GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 88 88 90 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 114
Write 101
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 87.9
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 84%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
105GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 78 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 122
Write 124
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 76.6
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
205GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 84 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 130
Write 122
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 82.3
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback