Seneca PRO384432

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSeneca PRO384432  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH61BF
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 05:51
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 193
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 379
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 76.2
56% 68.8 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 59
Splatting 76.9
54% 64.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 72 60 60 60 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.1% Above average
Read 250
Write 234
Mixed 203
SusWrite 75
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 24.2
93% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 140
117% 169 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback