Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GD
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime10 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 04:29
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 246
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 757
75% 612 Pts
64-Core 1024
63% 1024 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 13B1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 4.59
6% 12.3 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 4
Splatting 13
7% 7.46 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN03SM19EG128GBM2 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 34 61 41 37 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 446
Write 344
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 82.5
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 4.5
42% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 1.2
21% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 81%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
531GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 87 89 85 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 85.5
Write 84.4
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 86.2
50% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
9GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 6.5 8 8.6 8.8 9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 144
Write 17.8
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 9.2
44% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.3
132% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GD_FX505GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback