HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110318
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '20 at 19:58
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 95.8 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 153 68% 110 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 282 38% 284 Pts	64-Core 258 16% 258 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 401A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.5% Above average	Lighting 70.5 Reflection 67.3 Parallax 69.5 58% 69.1 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 52.1 49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB 4,055 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM81.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 197 228 226 223 223 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.9% Above average	Read 198 Write 211 Mixed 193 SusWrite 210 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 22.3 80% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 152 125% 179 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 100%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 440GB free Firmware: HP35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 107 110 107 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 104 Write 89.3 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 108 66% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
CE80CE80 M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 54.6 73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pro 3130 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

CPU
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples	87x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	80x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	56x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	62x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	18x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	7x

RAM
CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 9E02 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 9E02 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 9E02 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GBUnknownBench 41%, 7 samples	6x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 2C802C80 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBCE80CE80Bench 33%, 4 samples	4x
CM3X2G1333C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 45%, 737 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16