HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pro 3130 Microtower PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110318
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 11:49
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 90.1
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 157
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 161
16% 133 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.7% Above average
Lighting 72.5
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 73.9
59% 71.7 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 52.1
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM81.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 190 221 222 221 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.4% Above average
Read 198
Write 228
Mixed 192
SusWrite 203
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 28.9
99% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 149
122% 174 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
440GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 107 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 58
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 106
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
38.9% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3130 Microtower PC Builds (Compare 334 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3130 Microtower PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $138
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback