Asus A88X-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88X-PRO  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '17 at 05:08
Run Duration596 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Memory 14.5
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 87.8
27% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 173
19% 150 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 1945 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 38.7
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 55.5
32% 46.4 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 42.3
39% 48.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD PLUS 480GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z310 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 401
Write 341
Mixed 366
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 16.9
79% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 42.7
50% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 95%
Toshiba MK7575GSX 750GB-$63
489GB free
Firmware: GT00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 85.4
Write 59.4
Mixed 60.2
51% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.19
64% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
139GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 104
Write 88.9
Mixed 86.4
70% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.42
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
198GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 161
Write 139
Mixed 134
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.23
105% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 35.8
Mixed 35.6
46% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.22
78% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 49%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
21GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Read 22
Write 6.1
Mixed 8.95
13% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.09
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
83% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 19%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
14GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 18.4
Mixed 18.6
27% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.94
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.9
92% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 31%
hp v100w 8GB
7GB free, PID 3207
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 5.24
Mixed 7.21
11% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.73
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
30% 2.59 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-14900CL9-4GBSR F3-1866C9-8GSR F3-1866C9-8GSR 24GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 12
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 364
11% 364 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-PRO Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PRO - $278

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback