Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '17 at 02:14
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 196
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 378
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.19
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 22.5
20% 22.1 fps
MRender 27.9
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 19.2
19% 24.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
30GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 490
Write 139
Mixed 213
61% 281 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 22.3
100% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 13.5
54% 123 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 77%
Crucial C300-MTFDDAK128MAG 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0007 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 267
Write 134
Mixed 177
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 3.95
59% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.6
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 3.9
14% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 58%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
290GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 55.5
Mixed 46.7
41% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.31
90% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.7% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback