Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X3 710 965 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	54% Above average	Memory 85.3 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 88.7 49% 73.1 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 134 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140 15,701 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 104C) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 20 16% 18.8 fps	MRender 26.2 Gravity 24.1 Splatting 22.5 20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Disk drive 120GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.1% Below average	Read 246 Write 221 Mixed 203 SusWrite 18.1 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 18.9 64% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 74.3 69% 105 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 102%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 582GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 121 Write 122 Mixed 91.8 SusWrite 18.2 66% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 76%
Seagate ST920217AS 20GB 211 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 8GB free Firmware: 3.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 23.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 18.1 16% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 1600 CL9 Series000 1600 CL9 Series000 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 533, 533, 533, 533 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.7% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 12 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.5 22% 7.63 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 960TAMD $469Bench 54%, 4,461 samples	2x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	1x
9905402-669.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 36%, 23 samples	1x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 3x4GBMicronBench 42%, 163 samples	1x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203