Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Rampage Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090220
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 19:01
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 87.4
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 128
58% 93 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 125
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
PNY(196E 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 3.31
3% 3.68 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.26
4% 4.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 259 261 261 260 261 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate ST98823AS 80GB-$121
66GB free
Firmware: 7.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 34.8
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 35.8
24% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
Apple HDD HTS545050A7E362 500GB
401GB free
Firmware: GG2AB990
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 106 107 101 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 93.9
Mixed 37.7
SusWrite 105
61% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback