Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus Rampage Formula (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '20 at 22:31
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180 6,109 User benchmarks, average bench 44% LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 85.5 1-Core 64.7 2-Core 126 57% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 122 16% 123 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% PNY(196E 118B) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 4.35 Parallax 4.12 4% 4.27 fps	MRender 4.05 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 6.09 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 260 260 260 259 259 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate ST98823AS 80GB-$121 641 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 66GB free Firmware: 7.24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 35 36 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 34.6 Write 34.3 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 35.8 24% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 21%
Apple HDD HTS545050A7E362 500GB 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 400GB free Firmware: GG2AB990 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 106 106 104 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 100 Write 100 Mixed 38 SusWrite 104 62% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.4 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	36x
Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples	35x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	8x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	95x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	20x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16