HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 17-ca0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84D2
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 18:00
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 148
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 243
33% 244 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84D2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.08.04
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 7.78
5% 8.87 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 5.57
Splatting 14
8% 9.95 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 106 105 102 107 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 379
Write 165
Mixed 198
SusWrite 107
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 25.6
91% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29.1
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 24.9
42% 75.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 111 109 112 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 110
Write 70.7
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 110
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.6
255% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 25.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 18.2
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-ca0xxx Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback