HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 17-ca0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84D2
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180828
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 17:39
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Memory 10.3
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 115
32% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 196
20% 163 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84D2) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.08.04
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.77
Parallax 2.88
2% 3.31 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 5.09
3% 3.72 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6104006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 107 106 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 420
Write 212
Mixed 229
SusWrite 111
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 27.9
91% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 26.2
22% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 109 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 169
Write 24.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 109
60% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.9
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.1
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 401
10% 401 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-ca0xxx Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback