Asrock Z97 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140522
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 15:06
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 218
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 488
67% 499 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 3669) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.6% Good
Lighting 87.6
Reflection 86.1
Parallax 83.3
71% 85.7 fps
MRender 80.7
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 67.3
60% 74.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 174 132 113 100 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
58% Above average
Read 356
Write 246
Mixed 217
SusWrite 138
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 25.1
96% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 58.7
DQ Mixed 112
87% 125 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
159GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 107 107 131 143 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 191
Write 142
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 116
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
92GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 171 171 171 169 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 90
Write 71.8
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 169
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 134 135 133 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 112
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 133
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 54.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 21.6
41% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-809.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme6 - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $862
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback